Satisfactory planner
![satisfactory planner satisfactory planner](https://images7.alphacoders.com/108/1083975.jpg)
I think reason is new and increasing EV manufacturing in the state, as mentioned in the plan. The plan is very positive about EVs and infrastructure deployment. The state wants to make use of all federal NEVI program dollars available to it, and they’re considering the NEVI funding in the context of other EV infrastructure funding that is available in the state, including state and VW Settlement funds. The January plan provides a strong foundation for a plan that could be submitted to the Joint Office, though I do see the need for some updates to tailor the plan to the NEVI Program Guidance and plan template, which were both released after Alabama’s plan.Īlabama’s plan was an interesting read.
#Satisfactory planner update
But it seems likely: In my internet search quest to figure out whether the January plan would be the plan for Alabama, I did discover that an update to that plan is in the works and will be finalized in time to coincide with the deadline to submit plans. It is not clear that this plan or a version of this plan is what the Alabama DOT will submit to the Joint Office for approval to get the state’s NEVI funds. The Alabama draft plan I reviewed is the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Plan released in January 2022 by the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs-not the Alabama Department of Transportation (DOT). That’s because the timeline for states to compile a plan was quite short in the grand scheme of state regulatory agency action. Truth be told, I was pleasantly surprised that so many states did go through a plan proposal, public comment period, and refinement process.
![satisfactory planner satisfactory planner](https://images3.alphacoders.com/108/1083978.jpg)
I decided to start with Alabama, California, Texas, and Wyoming. I couldn’t get quite the representative cross section I wanted because there are still big gaps in which states have released a draft plan. I pulled a few draft plans to look at as a starting point, aiming for a cross section of states in different regions, with different politics, with different economic stakes in the EV transition, at different places in EV adoption, with different weather. Funds will be allocated to states each year for implementation based on a pre-established formula, provided the departments of transportation in those states submit a satisfactory EV charging plan to the Joint Office, with updates to the plan required annually. Funding under the NEVI program totals $5 billion from 2022 through 2026. Program funds can be used to plan for, install, operate, and maintain EV charging stations along travel corridors, with a focus on designated Alternative Fuel Corridors. The NEVI Program is one of two programs in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law that provide funding for publicly-accessible electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure. Examples of stakeholder, Indigenous community, and proponent collaboration during early planning for the regulatory approval process, including legislated impact assessment, of a multi-billion dollar infrastructure project with an extended timeline are provided.State plans for the National EV Charging Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program are due to the Joint Office of Energy and Transportation today, and many states released a draft plan for feedback in the last couple of months. A considerable benefit of the approach we outline is the establishment of good relationships between stakeholders, rights-holders, and the proponent, which facilitate dialogue regarding the goals of each party and how implementing the project can help to achieve them.
![satisfactory planner satisfactory planner](https://i.redd.it/cmksfbfyrh831.png)
Drawing from a case study of the Adaptive Phased Management Project proposed by Canada’s Nuclear Waste Management Organization, we show ways in which impact assessment can be leveraged to achieve beneficial outcomes for interested parties through early planning that includes a commitment to transparency and participatory engagement. This article demonstrates to proponents that adopting good practices early in the impact assessment process can help to achieve positive project outcomes.